The remarks Ms. Power has made on a wide range of foreign policy issues tell quite a story, according to a piece by Charles C. Johnson which appeared yesterday at The Blaze:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/07/16/here-are-some-of-samantha-powers-most-controversial-criticisms-of-america-ahead-of-senate-debate-on-u-n-ambassador-nomination/

If we couple this with the recent agreement between Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Senate Republican leaders about filibustering, it looks like we are in all likelihood in for more groveling at the UN before America’s enemies. At least, that is how it seems from my perspective.

Your comments?

As wacko as this will sound, the people Obama chooses are globalists. They want the West to fall because until that happens, the rest of their plans can’t take place. Its why our culture, traditions, and way of life are now classified as "offensive" to the rest of the world and she certainly wouldn’t want to offend anyone, except us of course. I believe approving Power was part of the deal to keep the from having votes per the majority rather than 60 in the Senate. The Democrats had approved far fewer appointees in the Bush administration at this point in the presidency than the Republicans have for Obama. The idea is to make take the US out of the leadership position in the world and sign on to the World Court so the UN has authority over us.

 

2 Responses to “What sort of US ambassador to the UN would Samantha Power be, given her past remarks on foreign policy?”

  1. BekindtoAnimals22 says:

    As wacko as this will sound, the people Obama chooses are globalists. They want the West to fall because until that happens, the rest of their plans can’t take place. Its why our culture, traditions, and way of life are now classified as "offensive" to the rest of the world and she certainly wouldn’t want to offend anyone, except us of course. I believe approving Power was part of the deal to keep the from having votes per the majority rather than 60 in the Senate. The Democrats had approved far fewer appointees in the Bush administration at this point in the presidency than the Republicans have for Obama. The idea is to make take the US out of the leadership position in the world and sign on to the World Court so the UN has authority over us.
    References :

  2. who WAS #1? says:

    Simple solution:
    Evict the UN from New York.
    Make them leave America. They can set up shop in some hellhole country where they would be happier. USA should not be a member of the UN; it has ceased to serve its intended purpose. Let the Arabs pay the bills; USA should not support the failed institution.
    References :

Leave a Reply